UN Council rejects Russia bid to limit Syrian aid deliveries

0
55

United Nations: The UN Security Council on Wednesday overwhelmingly rejected a Russian resolution that would have cut back the delivery of humanitarian aid to Syria’s mainly rebel-held northwest to just one crossing point from Turkey.

Western countries that voted against the resolution have insisted on keeping the two current crossings from Turkey, with strong backing from UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and humanitarian groups.

UN humanitarian chief Mark Lowcock has called the two crossings from Turkey a lifeline for millions of civilians whom the UN cannot reach by other means.

The Russian resolution needed a minimum of nine yes votes in the 15-member council for approval, but Moscow got support from only three other countries China, Vietnam and South Africa.

Its failure to get the nine votes meant the US, UK and France didn’t need to consider using their veto. Those three permanent council members voted against the resolution along with Germany, Belgium, Estonia and the Dominican Republic.

Four countries abstained Tunisia, Niger, Indonesia and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Russia, Syria’s closest ally, circulated the draft resolution after it joined China on Tuesday in vetoing a draft resolution co-sponsored by Germany and Belgium to maintain aid deliveries through two border crossing points from Turkey for a year. It received 13 yes votes.

The current Security Council mandate for UN cross-border aid deliveries expires Friday, and Germany and Belgium are expected to circulate a new proposal, likely to authorize the two current crossings from Turkey for six months.

In a joint statement after the vote, Germany and Belgium said that millions of people are counting on the Security Council to allow for as much humanitarian access as possible … (and) we will keep on working to this end.

Whether the differences between the five veto-wielding council members can be resolved in the next 48 hours remained to be seen.

Russia has argued that aid should be delivered from within Syria across conflict lines. But the UN and humanitarian groups say aid for 2.8 million needy people in the northwest can’t get in that way.

US Ambassador Kelly Craft accused Russia and China of breathtaking callousness and dishonesty and distorting the realities on the ground.

Their actions in both resolutions underscore a harrowing truth that Russia and China have decided that millions of Syrian lives are an insignificant cost of their partnership with the murderous Assad regime, she said in a statement.

Moutaz Adham, the Syria director for the humanitarian group Oxfam, called the council’s failure to reach agreement a devastating blow to the millions of Syrian families who rely on this aid for clean water, food, health care and shelter.

Cross-border aid is needed now more than ever, as Syrians face the threat of COVID-19, he said.

All available avenues for delivering aid will be critical in helping the more than 11 million people in need of assistance across Syria.

In January, Russia scored a victory for Syria, using its veto threat to force the Security Council to adopt a resolution reducing the number of crossing points for aid deliveries from four to just two, from Turkey to the northwest.

It also cut in half the yearlong mandate that had been in place since cross-border deliveries began in 2014 to six months, as Russia insisted.

The defeated German-Belgian resolution had dropped a call for the re-opening of an Iraqi crossing to the northeast to deliver medical supplies for the COVID-19 pandemic.

In May, Russia’s UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said: Do not waste your time on efforts to reopen the closed cross-border points.

The German-Belgian resolution would have extended the mandate for the two border crossings from Turkey to the northwest Bab al-Salam and Bab al-Hawa for a year.

The Russian-drafted resolution would only authorize cross-border deliveries through the Bab al-Hawa crossing for six months.